Peer Pressure

Dear Friends,

It is becoming clearer to me that the level of pressure you may be receiving from family members, employers, PCP's and society in general to receive the Covid vaccine may be becoming more and more inordinate and harder to combat. Most of you know my feelings about vaccines in general, but I wanted to take some time to give you some information to reinforce your arguments against this "vaccine" and potentially any others that they may have in the pipeline for future viral variants.

There is the potential for adverse reactions to any pharmaceutical agent and therefore there is no pharmaceutical intervention that is without risk. This is especially true for drugs for which the pharmaceutical industry has no liability as is the case with vaccines. You will see from the article on "18 Reasons I will not take the Covid 19 Vaccine" that these companies have a history of malfeasance and callous disregard and as such their treatments should come under intense scrutiny. Let the buyer beware.

First and foremost, you need to keep in mind that this is an experimental drug. The use of mRNA technology in pharmaceuticals is a new concept that is still going through testing in its various forms (testing that this vaccine did NOT go through) and has never been used in this application prior to this pandemic.

In its natural form, mRNA's function is to be an intermediary between DNA and protein synthesis It carries information from your DNA and transports it to the ribosomes of your cells instructing them to make whatever protein is required for cellular function and repair. In the case of the mRNA vaccines, it is telling your cells to create foreign proteins that your immune system will target and against which will create antibodies.

The problem is that mRNA in the vaccine is not a genetic "apples to apples" comparison to mRNA that your body would produce. It is a foreign material that is combined with other substances (like Polyethylene Glycol and Lipopolysaccharide) that has a high likelihood of triggering your immune system to react in a hyper-vigilant and thus negative fashion. This is especially true in my population of patients that have made huge strides to remove anything toxic from their external environment and have fine-tuned their bodies making their immune system more exquisitely sensitive to these types of interventions.

It is well documented that vaccines, of any kind, may trigger autoimmune diseases such as ITP (Immune Thrombocytopenia), Guillain Barre Syndrome, Transverse Myelitis, and 100's other disorders. One of the main reasons for performing long-term testing is to evaluate test subjects for higher incidences of neurodegenerative diseases such as ALS, Alzheimer’s, or Type 1 Diabetes along with the increased incidence of any kind of cancer or other potential degenerative diseases that may present months to years post-treatment.

It has been my personal experience that since 1986, with the increase in vaccine schedules afforded by the National Vaccine Injury Act indemnifying vaccine manufacturers from liability for injury, adverse reactions have exponentially increased as a consequence of this legislation and the increase in total vaccinations as of 1989. The EPA calls 1989 the open door year for diseases of unknown origin due to their exponential increase coinciding with the additional vaccines added to the schedule (See the Simpsonwood Transcripts).

I have already had several patients complaining of negative outcomes following a Covid vaccine. There are numerous reports of brain hemorrhage and blood clots to the heart that are occurring in the younger population receiving this vaccination. And only 1% or less of vaccine injuries are even reported in the US.

Excerpt from Green Med Info:
According to the latest figures derived from the European Medicines Agency's database of Covid-19 vaccine adverse reactions, 162,610 injurious events and 3,964 deaths have now been reported. Among the three major vaccines approved and deployed in Europe, Pfizer-BioNtech's vaccine accounts for over two-thirds of reported injuries and mortalities, or 102,100 and 2,540 events respectively. Curiously, women disproportionately account for 77% of adverse events; this greater than 1:4 gender ratio is also being observed for Moderna's and AstraZeneca's vaccines. So far there seems to be no scientific explanation to account for this gender disparity.

However, the EU's vaccine injury statistics are disturbing for another reason. It seems very apparent in our review of government and institutional figures that the EU has a far more robust and accurate vaccine injury reporting system in place. Given that the US started vaccinating adults against SARS-CoV-2 before the EU, we would expect to observe the number of reported adverse effects higher or at least proportionate. However, this is not the case. Since December 14, 2020, the CDC's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has only reported 44,606 adverse events and 2,050 deaths - a small fraction compared to Europe and where the average European citizen is generally healthier and where far fewer doses have been administered. 

Consider two other anomalies. According to Oxford University's global Covid-19 vaccine tracker, as of March 27th, the US has administered over 136 million doses, which accounts for about 25 percent of all Covid-19 vaccines administered worldwide. On the other hand, the EU nations have only administered 66 million doses -- less than a half compared to the US. In addition, the US vaccination rate is now approximately 41 per 100 Americans. EU nations have individually vaccinated 17 per 100 citizens or less. Therefore, why is there such an enormous discrepancy of adverse vaccine reactions between the US and EU? The EU is reporting a 0.2 percent adverse reaction rate whereas the US is claiming only 0.03 percent, almost a ten-fold difference.

As you would assume I am incredibly concerned about the adverse events from this vaccine, told and untold. Phase 3 trials have as yet to be completed, let alone the years that are required to look for long-term negative consequences. Pfizer has already "unblinded" the trials so that people who received the placebo of the vaccine can have access to the actual drug. This means that there will NEVER be true long-term placebo controls. They will no longer have a placebo group with which to compare rates of adverse events. This in effect will "hide" the potential long-term consequences of this vaccine.

This being said, I have included a few informational videos and articles that you may find helpful in combating misinformation and coercion from those around you who have opinions that may not be well-founded in true science. Valid science does not come from the Pharma captured media or government institutions like the CDC, NIH, or WHO where conflicts of interest as concerns Pharma have been documented for decades.


This video is one that everyone should watch from the ex VP and chief science officer of Pfizer. He makes it clear that there is a great deal of misinformation that needs to be corrected and speaks to the science of our immune competence as concerns Covid 19.
https://www.aier.org/article/an-education-in-viruses-and-public-health-from-michael-yeadon-former-vp-of-pfizer/


This is an article that came out last week on Children's Health Defense that everyone should read about the authors 18 reasons why he will not take the Covid vaccine:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/reasons-not-getting-covid-vaccine/

This video is from a pathologist out of Idaho who has interesting things to say about alternative therapies prescription therapies, natural therapies, and the current vaccination program: As of February 2022, this information has been censored.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0qqdDaPYwg